Realising the potential of patient and public involvement to make a difference: what can trial teams do?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Results We interviewed 21 chief investigators, 10 trial managers and 17 PPI contributors from 28 trials. Over half the informants indicted that PPI had made a difference, influencing either an aspect of a trial, or how trialists felt about a trial. Informants described how PPI’s impact depended on the quality of chief investigators’ goals and plans for PPI, the quality of relationships between trialists and PPI contributors, and stage at which PPI involvement was implemented. Including PPI contributors in responsive (e.g. advisory groups) and managerial (e.g. trial management groups) roles was thought more likely to achieve impact than oversight roles (e.g. trial steering committees).
منابع مشابه
Reaching Outside the Comfort Zone: Realising the FCTC’s Potential for Public Health Governance and Regulation in the European Union; Comment on “The Legal Strength of International Health Instruments – What It Brings to Global Health Governance?”
In their paper, Nikogosian and Kickbusch show how the effects of the adoption by the World Health Organization (WHO) of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) and its first Protocol extend beyond tobacco control and contribute to public health governance more broadly, by revealing new processes, institutions and instruments. While there are certainly good reasons to be optimisti...
متن کاملConsumers or Citizens? Whose Voice Will Healthwatch Represent and Will It Matter?; Comment on “Challenges Facing Healthwatch, a New Consumer Champion in England”
Efforts to achieve effective and meaningful patient and public involvement (PPI) in healthcare have existed for nearly a century, albeit with limited success. This brief commentary discusses a recent paper by Carter and Martin exploring the “Challenges Facing Healthwatch, a New Consumer Champion in England,” and places these challenges in the context of the broader struggle to give a voice to h...
متن کاملGovernance Must Dive Into Organizations to Make a Real Difference; Comment on “Governance, Government, and the Search for New Provider Models”
In their 2016 article, Saltman and Duran provide a thoughtful examination of the governance challenges involved in different care delivery models adopted in primary care and hospitals in two European countries. This commentary examines the limited potential of structural changes to achieve real reform and considers that, unless governance arrangements actually succeed in penetrating organizatio...
متن کاملThe Why, Who, What, How, and When of Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organizations: A Response to Recent Commentaries
متن کامل
Clinical Pharmacy in Iran: Where Do We Stand?
Since late 1960s, pharmacists in the USA and England have started a professional movement towards a more efficient presence in clinical wards of hospitals. A similar movement has started in developed European countries during the past decade. Pharmacists are convinced of the need for them to play their role as drug consultants and pharmacotherapy advisers to make decisions on drug therapy probl...
متن کامل